Legal Opinion
Rosenheck v. Rieber
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 13, 1996No. 95 CIV. 1031 (JSR)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RAKOFF, District Judge.
Once more the siren song of RICO lures temerarious litigants to their doom.
Plaintiffs Seymour and Jean Rosenheek allege that they are the victims of a “Ponzi” scheme perpetrated on them and others by William J. Reiber, Sr. and his company, Advance Payment Corp. Unfortunately for the Rosenhecks, both Reiber Sr. and Advance Payment filed for bankruptcy on April 5, 1994, and the Rosenhecks’ objections to the dischargeability of the debts allegedly owed them by these bankrupts have yet to be determined.
Undeterred, the Rosenhecks, on Valentine’s Day, 1995,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Sarah B. Shields, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc., George F. Taylor and Irwin EngelmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Michael E. Moss v. Morgan Stanley Inc., E. Jacques Courtois, Jr., Adrian Antoniu, and James M. Newman, Morgan Stanley Inc. And James M. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Ouaknine v. MacFarlaneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Katzman v. Victoria's Secret CatalogueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lippe v. Bairnco Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998