Legal Opinion

Austin v. Board of Higher Education

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1957Published

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph A. Gavagaw, J.

In this action at law, the plaintiffs, six discharged employees of the Board of Higher Education of the City of New York, the defendant herein, seek to recover their salaries from the time of their discharge. The gravamen of the amended complaint is that the dismissal of the plaintiffs was predicated on an unconstitutional section of the city charter and that they were dismissed without a hearing in violation of the statutory rights attendant upon their tenure of service. The defendant moves to dismiss the amended complaint for insufficiency on the ground that the only remedy for the relief…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Slochower v. Board of Higher Ed. of New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Daniman v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Toscano v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. Steinson v. . Bd. of Education of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Thoma v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1934

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API