Legal Opinion
Thoma v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 27, 1934PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.
On the 1st day of August, 1920, the plaintiff was appointed as assistant engineer, grade D, in the bureau of sewers, borough of Queens, pursuant to the civil service rules and regulations, and given a salary of $3,008. The Municipal Civil Service Commission of the city of New York had classified in the competitive class the position of assistant engineer, under the heading,
“ III. The Engineering Service.
“ Grade 4. Assistant Engineer.
“ The positions in the Engineering Service are graded according to the amount of the annual compensation or its equivalent, attaching to each, as follows:
“ Grade…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People ex rel. Stokes v. TullyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- People Ex Rel. Tyng v. . PrendergastNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- People ex rel. Tyng v. PrendergastAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Walters v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Wintersteen v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Toscano v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- State Division of Human Rights v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Sinicropi v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Matter of Barmonde v. KaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Matter of Sanger v. GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.