Legal Opinion

Rankin v. Atwood Vacuum MacHine Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 14, 1992No. C14-90-01074-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERTSON, Justice.

Kenneth L. Rankin appeals from a take nothing judgment rendered in his products liability suit. Rankin raises seven points of error, challenging the trial court’s submission of instructions regarding sole proximate cause and negligence per se, exclusion of testimony, and failure to grant a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. We affirm.

On the date of the accident forming the basis of the suit, Rankin and a co-worker, Russell Dougherty, were to retrieve a Coca Cola trailer. Either Rankin or Dougherty attached the trailer to the truck by use of a coupler…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Alvarado v. Farah Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Jackson v. Van WinkleTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Murray v. O & a Express, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Sharp v. Broadway National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Green Tree Acceptance, Inc. v. Combs, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Montes v. Pendergrass, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
  2. Rankin v. ATWOOD VACUUM MACHINE CO.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Janice and Joseph Barnett v. Veritas DGC Land, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  4. Kim-Lan Vu v. Marian S. Rosen, Robert E. Newey, and Rosen & Newey, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API