Legal Opinion

Mphj Technology Investments v. Ricoh Americas Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided February 13, 2017No. 2016-1243PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion concurring in part, dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge O’MALLEY.

NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

MPHJ Technology Investments, LLC appeals the decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board” or “PTAB”), on Inter Partes Review, that claims 1-8 of MPHJ’s U.S. Patent No. 8,488,173 (“the T73 Patent”) are invalid on the grounds of anticipation or obviousness.1 On appellate review, we affirm the Board’s decision.

To determine the validity of a patented invention, the meaning and scope of the claims are first determined. See Smiths Indus. Med. Sys., Inc. v. Vital Signs, Inc., 183 F.3d 1347,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Trustees of Columbia Univ. v. Symantec CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  3. Smiths Industries Medical Systems, Inc., as Successor of Intertech Resources Inc. v. Vital Signs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  4. Vederi, LLC v. Google, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Enplas Display Device Corpora v. Seoul Semiconductor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  2. Tviim, LLC v. McAfee, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  3. Ddr Holdings, LLC v. priceline.com LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
  4. Lecat's Ventriloscope v. MT Tool & Mfg.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. AptusTech LLC v. Trimfoot Co., LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API