Legal Opinion

Lecat's Ventriloscope v. MT Tool & Mfg.

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided January 11, 2018No. 16 C 5298PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge Rubén Castillo

Lecat's Ventriloscope ("Plaintiff") filed this suit against MT Tool and Manufacturing ("Defendant") for alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,645,141 ("the '141 Patent"). (R. 1, Compl.) Generally speaking, the invention disclosed and claimed in the '141 Patent is a device to help train physicians and other medical professionals in the use of "auscultation" devices (e.g. , stethoscopes) to evaluate and diagnose patients. The language of the claims defines the scope of a patent, and here, as happens in most patent infringement cases, the parties dispute the meaning…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  4. Richard Williamson v. Citrix Online, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  5. Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lecat's Ventriloscope v. MT Tool & Mfg.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. Grifols Diagnostic Solutions Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
  3. Lecat's Ventriloscope v. MT Tool and ManufacturingDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. Lecat's Ventriloscope v. MT Tool and ManufacturingDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Liu Feng v. Kitsure-BJTDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API