Legal Opinion

Neal v. Clark

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 20, 1942No. 15391PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court .was delivered by

Circuit Judge Wm. H. Grimball, Acting Associate Justice.

This is the second appeal in this case. The first is reported in 196 S. C., page 139, 12 S. E. (2d), 921, 924; and may be referred to for a synopsis of the pleadings and the text of the paper signed by Mrs. Clark, which is the center of this controversy.

In order to discuss and consider this case intelligently it is well to determine its real nature.

Appellant in his demurrer to the complaint states: “Aside from the note the only fact alleged for a recovery against the defendant is an alleged…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  2. Currie v. Davis, Agent, Etc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  3. Neal v. ClarkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  4. Fayssoux v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  5. Freeman v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harwell v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  2. Rutledge v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Hunter v. HyderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  4. QHG of Lake City, Inc. v. McCutcheonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  5. Howell v. HairstonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API