Legal Opinion

Neal v. Clark

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 22, 1941No. 15206PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Ci-iiEE Justice Bonham.

The plaintiff and defendant are brother and sister. They have two sisters, Mrs. Frances C. Keel and Mrs. Sallie C. Brannon. The plaintiff-respondent alleges in her complaint that their mother, Mrs. Leatha Clark, made, on the 10th day of February, 1932, a partial distribution of her .estate to her four above-named children by giving to each of them one-fourth of the sum of the notes owed to her by the four children; that the total of this sum amounted to $10,417.48; that the amount of the notes owned by Mrs. Keel was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. RoweSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  3. Owens v. Owens, MayorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  4. Lowe v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  5. Sumter v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Scott M. WaldronCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
  2. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. WaldronDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1979
  3. Neal v. ClarkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  4. Robert L. Huffines, Jr., Foundation, Inc. v. Rockie Realty, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1972
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance v. WaldronCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API