Legal Opinion
County of Isanti v. Peterson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 7, 1991No. C0-90-2588PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Appellants challenge a judgment directing them to conform the use of property to the Isanti County zoning ordinance. They argue the trial court erred by placing the burden of proof on them and by applying the wrong legal standard for discontinuance of a nonconforming use. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellants Mary Ann Peterson and Thomas Date purchased two adjacent parcels of land in Isanti County in 1979. Mary Ann Peterson and her husband, Dale Peterson, own Dale Movers, Inc., a company in the business of selling and transporting houses and other structures. Dale Movers stored…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gruenhagen v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Essex Leasing, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Hartley v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Commissioner of Revenue v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Novack v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- City of University Place v. McGuireCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- City of University Place v. McGuireCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.