Legal Opinion
United States v. Campbell
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided December 10, 2009No. 08-0660/NAPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge STUCKY
delivered the opinion of the Court.
We granted review of three issues raised by the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA), as follows:
I.WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN REASSESSING APPELLANT’S SENTENCE, AS (1) ITS REASSESSMENT CALCULUS WAS BASED UPON AN ERRONEOUS UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT SPECIFICATIONS WERE MERGED; (2) IT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN FAILING TO ORDER A SENTENCE REHEARING IN LIGHT OF APPELLANT BEING SENTENCED UPON TWICE THE AMOUNT OF SPECIFICATIONS AS APPROPRIATE; AND (3) THE UNDERLYING LOGIC USED TO NOT REDUCE APPELLANT’S SENTENCE…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. QuirozCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
- United States v. LloydCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. PaulingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. WheelerUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
- United States v. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
- United States v. ForresterCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
- United States v. ParkerUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
- United States v. CraigCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.