State v. Holmes
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
NEWBY, Justice.
This case presents the issue of whether a suspended sentence can be challenged when appealing the trial court’s order revoking probation and activating the sentence. We hold that a direct appeal from the original judgment lies only when the sentence is originally entered. Accordingly, we reverse the Court of Appeals as to that issue.
Defendant pled guilty on 11 March 2004 to second-degree kidnapping, assault inflicting serious bodily injury, and accessory after the fact to second-degree rape. The trial court determined defendant had a prior record level of I and found two…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. HinnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. NolesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. RushCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gore v. Myrtle/MuellerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
- In Re WebberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. SatanekCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. PennellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
- State v. LongCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.