State v. Pennell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BEASLEY, Justice.
We consider whether, on direct appeal from the activation of a suspended sentence, a defendant may challenge the jurisdictional validity of the indictment underlying his original conviction. Because a challenge to the validity of the original judgment constitutes an impermissible collateral attack, we hold that defendant’s appeal was not proper. Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals with respect to this issue.
Defendant William Herbert Pennell pleaded guilty on 2 December 2010 to two counts of felony breaking or entering, two counts of felony larceny…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. CaudleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. NolesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. RushCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. . RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
- State v. HoskinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- State v. DuffCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- State v. FlanaganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
- State v. FlanaganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.