Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 27, 2011No. AC 32044PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEAR, J.

The petitioner, Ryan Thompson, appeals following the denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgment denying his petition for a writ of habeas coipus. The petitioner claims that the habeas court abused its discretion in denying certification to appeal in that it (1) erred in rejecting his claim that his trial counsel had provided ineffective assistance and (2) erred in excluding evidence relevant and admissible to prove the elements of ineffective assistance of counsel. We dismiss the appeal.

The following relevant facts, as stated by our Supreme Court in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. California v. TybergSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
  2. Antonio A. v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  3. STEPHEN S. v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  4. Houghtaling v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  5. Clinton S. v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API