Legal Opinion

Hunnicutt v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 1, 2004No. AC 23459PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLYNN, J.

The petitioner, Camell Hunnicutt, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.1 On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly concluded that his defense counsel was effective in representing him. The petitioner specifically contends that his coun*201sel failed to investigate the petitioner’s mental and physical health adequately prior to his entering a guilty plea to determine whether his guilty plea was knowing and voluntary. The petitioner also claims that the trial court’s plea canvass was inadequate and that his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Copas v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. Safford v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mercado v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  2. Griffin v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  3. Toles v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  4. Shelton v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  5. Brown v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API