Legal Opinion
Barry v. St. Anthony-New Brighton Independent School District 282
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 20, 2010No. A09-1093PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
In this appeal from an administrative law judge’s dismissal of relators’ complaint for failing to allege a prima facie violation of the Minnesota campaign-finance statutes, relators argue that the administrative law judge improperly construed the statute and erroneously found that the complaint failed to state a prima facie case. We affirm.
FACTS
Relators Paul Barry and David Spano reside within the St. Anthony-New Brighton Independent School District 282 (the school district). Relators filed a complaint with the office of administrative hearings (the OAH) alleging that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Geibe v. GeibeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- In re the Risk Level Determination of C.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
3Cited by4 opinions
- Abrahamson v. St. Louis County School DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Abrahamson v. St. Louis County School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Minnesota Voters Alliance, Relators v. Anoka-Hennepin School District, Minnesota Office of Administrative HearingsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Abrahamson v. St. Louis County School DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012