Borough of Beaver v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SMITH-RIBNER.
The Borough of Beaver (Borough) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) granting the claim petition filed by James Rose seeking workers’ compensation benefits for a mental injury caused by his employment with the Borough of Beaver Police Department. The Borough’s statement of questions includes whether the WCJ erred as a matter of law in finding the work conditions to have been abnormal and whether the WCJ erred in relying upon equivocal or incompetent…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Ryan v. Workman's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Wilson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Payes v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Agresta v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Payes v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Zink v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Zink v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003