Legal Opinion

Borough of Beaver v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 2002PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SMITH-RIBNER.

The Borough of Beaver (Borough) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) granting the claim petition filed by James Rose seeking workers’ compensation benefits for a mental injury caused by his employment with the Borough of Beaver Police Department. The Borough’s statement of questions includes whether the WCJ erred as a matter of law in finding the work conditions to have been abnormal and whether the WCJ erred in relying upon equivocal or incompetent…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Ryan v. Workman's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Wilson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Payes v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Agresta v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Payes v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Zink v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Zink v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API