Legal Opinion

First State Bank of Mathis v. McCoy

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 6, 1929No. 8169PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The controlling question presented by appellant is that of whether or not an allegation in an affidavit for writ of garnishment that the writ is not “sued out to injure either the defendant or the garnishee” is sufficient, where there is more than one defendant whose property is'sought to be impounded. The statute requires that the affidavit for garnishment must contain a statement that the writ “is not sued out to injure either the defendant or the garnishee.”

It must be conceded that the statutory requirements in this summary proceedings must be substantially pursued and strictly construed,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gunst v. PelhamTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Willis v. Lyman, Sears & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Buerger v. WellsTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Kildare Lumber Co. v. Atlanta BankTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Perrill & Fox v. RungeTexas Supreme Court · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sweatt v. GroganDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API