Legal Opinion

Bowman v. Bohney

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1922PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMccarthy, J.

This is an action to recover $500 alleged to be due on a contract for the purchase of real estate. Respondent made a conveyance to appellant which included an undivided one-half interest in a certain 40 acres, and agreed to secure a conveyance to appellant of the other undivided half interest, which was owned by a Mrs. Rose. They entered into the following written escrow agreement:

“May 22, 1917.
“Citizens National Bank,
“You will hold $500.00 paid in by Joseph D. Bohney until a certain deed is delivered to you signed by Mrs. W. A. Rose and properly executed. Then pay the amount $500.00 to J. W.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Duluth Chamber of Commerce v. KnowltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. Davenport v. BurkeIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Walling v. BownIdaho Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Idaho Placer Mining Co. v. GreenIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  5. County of Chippewa v. St. Paul, Stillwater & Taylor's Falls RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Steel Farms, Inc. v. Croft & Reed, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Nissula v. Southern Idaho Timber Protective Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Cedarholm v. STATE FARM MUTUAL INS. COMPANIESIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Exchange Lumber & Mfg. Co. v. ThomasIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Rosendahl v. Lemhi Valley BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API