Legal Opinion

Rosendahl v. Lemhi Valley Bank

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

This action was brought by appellant to recover from respondent bank certain Liberty bonds, or the value thereof, alleged to have been deposited with the bank for safekeeping and as a special, deposit. The cause was tried to the court and a jury, and after evidence had been introduced by both sides the court directed the jury to return a verdict for respondent. From the judgment entered on the verdict so returned an appeal has been prosecuted.

The main question for determination is whether the court erred in not submitting the ease to the jury. In limine, a motion to instruct the jury to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Estate of CasparCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Perera v. Panama-Pacific International Exp. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Mayer v. BrensingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Knights v. PiellaMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Morgan v. . BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Servel v. CorbettIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Burt v. Blackfoot Motor Supply Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Low v. Park Price CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Alford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  5. Carson v. ByeIdaho Supreme Court · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API