Legal Opinion

$162,950 in Currency of United States v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)

Decided January 4, 1996No. 11-94-192-CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ARNOT, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a civil forfeiture proceeding -under Chapter 59 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. 1 After a bench trial, the trial court ordered that $162,100 be forfeited to the State and that $850 be returned to Alejandro Acosta, the party in interest. We affirm.

Forfeiture proceedings of seized property are civil in nature. Article 59.05(b). Where, as in this case, findings of fact and conclusions of law are neither filed nor requested, the appellate court must presume that the trial court made all the necessary findings to support the judgment.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lassiter v. BlissTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  2. United States v. Edelmiro Augustin FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  3. Fifty-Six Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars in U.S. Currency v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Money of the United States in the Amount of $8,500.00 v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Spurs v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. $7,058.84 in U.S. Currency v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Davis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2009
  3. 1.70 Acres, .20 Acres, & .28 Acres of Real Property & Structures Thereon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1996
  4. Four Thousand One Hundred Eighty-Two Dollars in United States Currency v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1997
  5. 1979 Pontiac Automobile v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API