Legal Opinion

1979 Pontiac Automobile v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)

Decided September 10, 1998No. 11-97-00414-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ARNOT, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a civil forfeiture proceeding under Chapter 59 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. 1 After a bench trial, the trial court ordered that a 1979 Pontiac automobile be forfeited to the State and that $450 be returned to Billy Mack Walker, Jr., the party in interest. We affirm.

Forfeiture proceedings of seized property are civil in nature. Article 59.05(b). When findings of fact and conclusions of law are neither filed nor requested, the appellate court must presume that the trial court made all the necessary findings to support the judgment.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Crockett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Haas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  2. Walter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  3. Danny Eugene Ivie v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2013
  4. Billy Lee Walter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  5. Charles Lee King v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API