Legal Opinion
Lichina v. Futura, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided August 29, 1966No. Civ. A. 9071PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ARRAJ, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motions of defendant Riblet Tramway Company to quash service of the alias summons and second amended complaint, to vacate the Orders of the Court dated July 29, 1966, to dismiss, and to strike portions of the second amended complaint. The Court granted an earlier motion to quash because the plaintiff failed to comply with the exact procedure prescribed in Colo.Rev.Stat.Ann. § 31-9-19(3), as amended, Colo.Sess. Laws ch. 109, p. 437 (1965).
Since that time the plaintiff has again sought to perfect in personam…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
- Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Ruby Velandra and Roy Velandra v. Regie Nationale Des Usines Renault and Renault, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Duple Motor Bodies, Ltd. v. Clarence A. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Waterval v. District Court in and for El Paso CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- City of New York v. A-1 Jewelry & Pawn, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Allied Towing Corp. v. Great Eastern Petroleum Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1986
- Corporate Stock Transfer, Inc. v. AE Biofuels, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.