Legal Opinion
Waterval v. District Court in and for El Paso County
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided October 27, 1980No. 80SA332PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Justice.
In this original proceeding under C.A.R. 21, Richard Waterval (petitioner) seeks relief in the nature of prohibition against the respondent district court on the ground that its assertion of jurisdiction over him for transacting business in the State of Colorado violates due process of law. We issued a rule to show cause. We now determine that the district court may constitutionally exercise jurisdiction over the petitioner under the Colorado long-arm statute, section 13-l-124(l)(a), C.R.S.1973, and discharge the rule.
I
Petitioner is an attorney licensed to practice law in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Arthur F. Sawtelle, Etc. v. George E. FarrellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Behagen v. Amateur Basketball Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Archangel Diamond Corp. v. LukoilSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Crowe & Dunlevy, P.C. v. StidhamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Behagen v. Amateur Basketball Association Of The United States Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.