Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cooper v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1959No. 33657Published

1DissentFoster, J.

(dissenting) — While I agree with Judge Hunter’s views, I dissent upon the additional ground that the statute, as construed by the court, renders the industrial insurance act unconstitutional under the due process clause of the 14th amendment to the United States constitution.

The court holds:

“The supervisor held that such a series of shocks did not constitute an industrial injury. We agree. ...” Cooper v. Department of Labor & Industries, 49 Wn. (2d) 826, 307 P. (2d) 272.

This in itself would not render the industrial insurance act unconstitutional if appellant could recover in a civil action…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Mountain Timber Company v. State of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Cooper v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Anthony v. National Fruit Canning Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Epley v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API