Legal Opinion

Epley v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1937No. 26064. En BancPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Hazel Epley, while engaged in an employment defined under the workmen’s compensation act as extrahazardous, sustained injuries from which she died. She left two children, Jack and Marie, under sixteen years of age. Their father, Ernest Epley, having been appointed guardian, made claim for compensation in their behalf to the department of labor and industries. The supervisor denied the claim on the ground that the claimants did not come within the terms of the act. Application to the joint board for rehearing was denied for the same reason. Appeal was taken to the superior court of Thurston…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Anthony v. National Fruit Canning Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Roswall v. Grays Harbor Stevedore Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cooper v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API