State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Reed
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HIGHTOWER, Justice.
This cause presents the question whether there is coverage under a homeowners insurance policy that excludes coverage for “business pursuits” of an insured except those pursuits that are “ordinarily incidental to non-business pursuits.” Joseph and Francis Reed (the Reeds) and Michael and Sheree Ford (the Fords) filed a declaratory judgment action against State Farm Insurance Company (State Farm) seeking a declaration of coverage under a homeowner’s insurance policy (policy) it issued for liability arising out of the death of the Fords’ child while at a home child…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Forbau Ex Rel. Miller v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Hudson Energy Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
- Barnett v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
- Puckett v. U.S. Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Crane v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1971
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. HallmanTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. VaughanTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Evergreen National Indemnity Co v. Tan It All, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
- Hooper v. Chittaluru, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
- CU Lloyd's of Texas v. Hatfield, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.