Legal Opinion

Matter of Application of Davidson

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 7, 1914No. Civ. No. 1262PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPLICATION for Writ of Mandate to be directed to the Clerk of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

An action was brought in the above entitled court by petitioner against Samuel Hinckley and A. T. Harry to recover the sum of twenty-five hundred dollars. Plaintiff claimed that Harry was in default for failure to answer and made demand that the clerk of the court enter said default, which he refused. Thereupon plaintiff moved the court to direct judgment to be entered in her favor on the ground that said defendant had not answered to the complaint of plaintiff within the time allowed by law. According to an allegation of the petition herein it appears: “That thereafter, to wit, on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Application of DavidsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Rickey Land & Cattle Co. v. GladerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  3. Stewart v. TorranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tannahill v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API