Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Grieser

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 5, 1901PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from the District Court of Garfield County; before John L. McAtee, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burford, C. J.:

The defendant in error, Julius Grieser, made application to the board of county commissioners of Garfield county for license to sell liquors at retail in the city of Enid. The plaintiff in error, H. H. Watkins, filed a remonstrance against the granting of such license, and the case was set for hearing before the county board. The remonstrance is as follows:

“Comes now H. H. Watkins, and remonstrates and objects to tbe issuance of license to Julius Grieser to sell at retail vinous, spirituous and malt liquors, as prayed for in the petition now on file in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stockwell v. BrantIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Groscop v. RainierIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Bronson v. DunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Golden v. BinghamIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Swan v. WildersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rohrer v. Hastings Brewing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  2. In Re Free's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Mitchell v. DadasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Powell v. MorrillNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  5. In re KrugNebraska Supreme Court · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API