Legal Opinion

In re Krug

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1904No. 13,433PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to the district court for Douglas county: Lee 5. Estelle, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, C. J.

This is a proceeding in error, prosecuted by the remonstrant, to have the record reviewed and secure the *577reversal of an order of the district court dismissing his appeal taken to that court from an order of the hoard of fire and police commissioners of the city of Omaha granting a license to sell intoxicating liquors on the application of the person named therein as licensee.

1. It is urged by defendant in error that no motion for a new trial, as by law required, was filed in this case, and therefore no questions are properly presented for review. It is held in Bennett v. Otto, 68 Neb. 652,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bennett v. OttoNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Watkins v. GrieserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  3. Hall v. HartNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. In re TierneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  5. State v. LydickNebraska Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brinkworth v. ShembeckNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Batten v. KlammNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Anderson v. McDonaldNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Moise v. WeymullerNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Shue v. LeeNebraska Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API