Legal Opinion

Stockwell v. Brant

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1884No. 11,679PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From the Lawrence Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

The appellant applied to the county board for a license to sell intoxicating liquors in a less quantity than a quart at a time. The appellees were the remonstrators before the county board. ,

The county board refused to grant the license; on an appeal to the circuit court a jury returned a verdict that the appellant was not a fit person to be entrusted with a license, and judgment was rendered on the verdict, followed by this appeal.

*475In the circuit court the appellees, over the objection of the appellant, were permitted to amend the remonstrance they had filed before the county…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Green v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Goodwin v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Yost v. ConroyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. McDermott v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. KellyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. GerhardtIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Germania Fire Insurance v. PitcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Hardy v. McKinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Rohrer v. Hastings Brewing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API