Legal Opinion

In Re Davidson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 2004No. 49S00-0401-DI-28PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Disciplinary Action.

2Per curiam

The Disciplinary Commission has charged the respondent, Clifton Bruce Davidson, Jr., with six counts of attorney misconduct. Specifically, the Commission alleges that clients hired the respondent to represent them in various matters for which he accepted retainers and/or filing fees. After taking his clients' money, the respondent took little or no action on his clients' behalves and failed to respond to their inquiries about their cases. Ultimately, the respondent abandoned his law practice. Today we find, as did the hearing officer, that the respondent violated the Rules…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of DrozdaIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Matter of GoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. In Re WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Matter of JarrettIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In Re RadfordIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ashby v. Bar Plan Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Ashby v. DavidsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API