In Re Radford
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
Kathleen Ransom Radford agreed to represent clients in legal matters, then failed to take any meaningful action at all on their behalves, and ultimately abandoned her law practice without seeing to it that the clients' interests were adequately protected. She also failed to refund to the clients almost $4,000 in unearned retainer fees they had paid to her.
This attorney disciplinary case comes before us now upon the report of the hearing officer who conducted evidentiary hearing on the Disciplinary Commission's 14-count complaint for disciplinary action. The report finds…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of DrozdaIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- In re McGrathIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Matter of RadfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re LightIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- In Re WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re DavidsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Fowler v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
- In Re GariepyIndiana Supreme Court · 2002