Legal Opinion
Isaacson v. House
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided March 9, 1961No. 21106PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Justice.
The petition in the instant case is patterned after that of Manget Realty Co. v. Carolina Realty Co., 169 Ga. 495 (150 S. E. 828), held by this court to sufficiently set forth a cause of action. The cases differ in no material particular. The cause is founded on the same principles pronounced in other cases. Parsons v. Fox, 179 Ga. 605 (176 S. E. 642); Rogers v. Blouenstein, 124 Ga. 501 (52 S. E. 617, 3 L. R. A. (NS) 213); Pope v. Marshall, 78 Ga. 635 (4 S. E. 116); Simpson v. Charters, 185 Ga. 592 (196 S. E. 31).
In order to avoid a deed absolute on its face by showing it to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pope v. MarshallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Verner v. McLartySupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Fitzgerald v. VaughnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Manget Realty Co. v. Carolina Realty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Engelking v. Investment BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- Clark v. Aaron's, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2012
- Dorsey v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Biggs v. LyngCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.