Legal Opinion

Dorsey v. City of Atlanta

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 6, 1961No. 21179PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Justice.

Unquestionably, the legislature possesses the authority to confer upon a municipality the right to provide public streets and to compel the owners of realty fronting thereon to pay the costs of these improvements. Hayden v. City of Atlanta, 70 Ga. 817. But this power is not absolute, and one of the limitations is the guarantee of equal protection of the laws as embodied in the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and art. 1, sec. 1, par 2 of the Constitution of Georgia. See Georgia R. & Bkg. Co. v. Wright, 125 Ga. 589 (54 S. E. 52). This constitutional…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Hayden v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  4. City of Valdosta v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  5. City of Atlanta v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Benefit Support, Inc. v. Hall CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Flournoy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  3. GW v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  4. Srochi v. KamenskyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  5. Dansby v. DansbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API