Lean v. Leeds
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Learning, who filed the following opinion: “I shall not undertake at this time to dispose of this matter finally; further reflection or suggestion of counsel by way of brief, if counsel desire to be heard further, may change my views. At this time, however, I wish to outline my views sufficiently to enable counsel to at least apprehend the present condition of my mind in the matter.
Read the full summary
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Learning, who filed the following opinion: “I shall not undertake at this time to dispose of this matter finally; further reflection or suggestion of counsel by way of brief, if counsel desire to be heard further, may change my views. At this time, however, I wish to outline my views sufficiently to enable counsel to at least apprehend the present condition of my mind in the matter. “I am unable to see at this time any possible defence to this ease, unless, perchance, it he a defence growing out of the mental…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.
*460For affirmance—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Savayze, Trenct-iard,Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbacíi, White, I-Ieppenheimer, Williams, Taylor—13. For reversal—None.
2Cited by8 opinions
- Ocean Cape Hotel Corp. v. Masefield Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- River Development Corp. v. Liberty Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Miller v. HeadleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
- Gottlaub v. CohenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
- Becker v. Sunrise at ElkridgeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.