Legal Opinion
Nu-Enamel Corp. v. Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 24, 1938No. 6268PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff appeals from a decree of the District Court dismissing for want of equity its bill for infringement of a trade-mark and to recover damages for unfair competition. The latter ground for relief was not considered by the court on its merits, but was disposed of by a finding that the court, having found the trade-mark invalid, had no jurisdiction to grant relief for unfair competition.
The sufficiency of the bill of complaint was before this court in Nu-Enamel Corp. v. Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works, 7 Cir., 81 F.2d 1, and it was there held that the bill was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Coca-Cola Co. v. Koke Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Northam Warren Corporation v. Universal Cosmetic Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1927
- Barton v. Rex-Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
- United States v. Coca Cola Co. of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- California Fruit Growers Exchange v. Windsor Beverages, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- Steem-Electric Corp. v. Herzfeld-Phillipson Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- J. R. Wood and Sons, Inc. v. Reese Jewelry CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Colburn v. Puritan Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.