Legal Opinion

COMPTROLLER OF TREASURY, IT DIV. v. Armco, Inc.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 5, 1987No. 744, September Term, 1986PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POLLITT, Judge.

Constitutional questions concerning the State’s power to tax have long occupied this country’s courts. Chief Justice John Marshall declared almost 200 years ago that “The power to tax involves the power to destroy,” in finding unconstitutional the efforts of the State of Maryland to tax a national bank. 1 In this appeal, we find the State’s efforts to apply a tax exclusion to corporate subsidiaries engaged in the export of domestic goods must meet a similar fate, because the exclusion discriminates against corporations doing the majority of their business in other states, and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. DiasSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Insurance Commissioner v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Muller v. CurranCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  3. COMPTROLLER OF TREASURY, IT DIV. v. NCR Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  4. Comptroller of the Treasury v. Armco Export Sales Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. Muller v. CurranCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API