COMPTROLLER OF TREASURY, IT DIV. v. Armco, Inc.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
POLLITT, Judge.
Constitutional questions concerning the State’s power to tax have long occupied this country’s courts. Chief Justice John Marshall declared almost 200 years ago that “The power to tax involves the power to destroy,” in finding unconstitutional the efforts of the State of Maryland to tax a national bank. 1 In this appeal, we find the State’s efforts to apply a tax exclusion to corporate subsidiaries engaged in the export of domestic goods must meet a similar fate, because the exclusion discriminates against corporations doing the majority of their business in other states, and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. DiasSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Insurance Commissioner v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Muller v. CurranCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- COMPTROLLER OF TREASURY, IT DIV. v. NCR Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Comptroller of the Treasury v. Armco Export Sales Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Muller v. CurranCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989