Legal Opinion
Kimberlin v. City of Topeka
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided December 6, 1985No. 57,630PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
McFarland, J.:
This is a consolidated appeal of three actions challenging the validity of an airport hazard zoning joint ordinance and resolution enacted by the City of Topeka and the County of Shawnee. The plaintiffs are landowners in the area subject to the ordinance/resolution. The district court upheld the validity of the ordinance/resolution in a trial of the consolidated cases and plaintiffs appeal therefrom.
The ordinance of the defendant City of Topeka is No. 14650 and was adopted on May 13, 1980. The defendant City’s ordinance is codified as…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. RoatSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
- City of Ottawa v. LesterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
- Shanks v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- McCaffree Financial Corp. v. NunninkCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1993
- Bair v. BairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.