Legal Opinion

State v. Roat

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 19, 2020No. 113531PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS Nos. 113,531 113,532 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. TONY R. ROAT, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. A case is moot when a court determines it is clearly and convincingly shown that the actual controversy has ended, that the only judgment that could be entered would be ineffectual for any purpose, and that it would not have an impact on any of the parties' rights. 2. The mootness doctrine is based on and gives effect to prudential considerations, such as conservation of judicial resources. 3. The determination of whether a case is moot is subject to…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Christopher v. HarburySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Baker v. HaydenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
  2. State v. CastleCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  3. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  4. Roll v. HowardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  5. State v. MoellerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API