Legal Opinion

People v. Day

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1989PublishedCited by 138 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Bellacosa, J.

After a jury trial and conviction, the Trial Justice sentenced defendant on four counts of criminal possession of a forged instrument and of stolen property to four concurrent terms, and on one count of attempted grand larceny to a term consecutive to the other terms. Defendant argues that the trial court was precluded by Penal Law § 70.25 (2) from imposing a consecutive sentence because the crimes of convic*210tion were all part of the same act or, as the statute alternatively proscribes, because the possessory offenses were a material element of the attempted…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. FarrarNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. GloverNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Morgan v. DevineSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. People v. TannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. People ex rel. Maurer v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by138 opinions

  1. People v. LaureanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. People v. RamirezNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. People v. NaranjoNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. People v. ParksNew York Court of Appeals · 2000

133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API