Legal Opinion
Walsh v. Kirby
California Supreme Court
Decided December 11, 1974No. S. F. 22991PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WRIGHT, C. J.
We granted a writ to review the decision of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board (the board) affirming a decision of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (the department) imposing a penalty of $9,250 on Antonio Duarte doing business as Lawton Liquors, a retail off-sale general liquor licensee, for 10 sales of distilled spirits at less than the minimum retail prices established in accordance with law. (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 24749-24757.)
Petitioner complains of a practice whereby the department accumulated evidence of recurring sales of distilled spirits…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Bailey v. TaaffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Gossman v. GossmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- State Board of Dry Cleaners v. Thrift-D-Lux Cleaners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- People ex rel. Lockyer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Perez v. City of San BrunoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- City and County of San Francisco v. SainezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.