Legal Opinion

Trulsson v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 26, 1919No. Civ. No. 2853PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in the defendant’s favor after the granting of a motion for nonsuit at the close of the plaintiff’s ease.

The action was one to recover damages for injuries sustained by the plaintiff through the alleged negligence of the defendant. The facts of the case are these: The plaintiff, who at the time of the injuries complained of was, and for a period of between two and three years prior thereto had been, a resident of Palo Alto, had, on the thirteenth day of March, 1917, purchased a commutation-ticket book which entitled him to a first-class daily passage upon the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Holmes v. South Pacific Coast RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Choquette v. Key System Transit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Mac Gregor v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Metzler v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API