Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Ingram

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 12, 1950No. 17184PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wyatt, Justice.

1. Counsel in the instant case devote much of their argument to the question of whether or not the allegations of the petition are sufficient to authorize a court of equity to decree that there had been a virtual adoption of the petitioner by the testator. In the view we take of this case, it is not necessary to pass upon that question here.

2. A will is to be construed by the law as it exists at the date of the death of the testator. Hertz v. Abrahams, 110 Ga. 707 (36 S. E. 409). Hence, the 1949 act of the Georgia Legislature (Ga. L. 1949, p. 1157) has no application to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hertz v. AbrahamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Hicks v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Comer v. ComerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  4. Floyd v. FloydSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  5. Everitt v. LaspeyreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cooper v. MelvinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  2. Carnegie v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  3. Smyth v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  4. Butts v. Trust Company of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  5. Trust Co. Bank v. HeywardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API