Ayer v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WREN, Judge.
Petitioner’s claim for compensation was denied by the Industrial Commission on the ground that no causal connection had been established between her employment and the alleged injury; and further, that she had failed to show that she had sustained an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of her employment within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Act.
Briefly the facts are as follows. Petitioner had worked as a switchboard operator for the respondent,. Greyhound Corporation for 27 years. Her duties consisted of running a switchboard, giving bus schedule…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pierce v. Phelps Dodge Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1933
- Matter of MitchellArizona Supreme Court · 1944
- Paulley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Dunlap v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Reilly v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Dunlavey v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Transportation Insurance Co. v. MaksynTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- McDonough v. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Seitz v. L & R INDUSTRIES, INC., ETC.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.