Rushing v. Ambest, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
*578 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KATHRYN H. VRATIL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring putative class action claims for damages and injunctive relief against motor fuel retailers in Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia and the District of Columbia. Plaintiffs claim that because defendants sell motor fuel for a specified price per gallon without disclosing or adjusting for temperature expansion, they are liable under state law theories including breach of contract,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Minter v. Prime Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Robert H. E. Frank, Jerry D. Mooberry, Tyrone G. Moreno v. U.S. West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Ocelot Oil Corporation v. Sparrow IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Clarendon National Insurance Company v. GlickaufDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019
- Clear Spring Property & Casualty Company v. Arch Nemesis, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al. v. Genesh, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2026
- McGee v. PachecoDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020
- Scott Gregory Rundquist Trust v. Clerk of the District Court, Wyandotte County, KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.