Legal Opinion

Holliday v. Pickhardt

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided March 11, 1882PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. On motion for preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtBlatchford, C. J.

Professor Seeley testifies that he practiced the process set forth in No. 250,247, using the exact proportions and materials specified therein, and produced thereby a product, a sample of which is Exhibit B. He says that Exhibit A (the defendants’ article) seems to him to ho identical with B; that he has tested them in various ways to determine their similarity; and that he is clearly of opinion that A is the product described in No. 250,247, and claimed in the first claim thereof. Professor Morton, for the defendants, does not say that A is not identical with B. What he says is that B is,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hanford v. WestcottU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1879

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Read Holliday & Sons, Ltd. v. Schulze-BergeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1896
  2. John Morrell & Co. v. DoyleDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1937
  3. Oregon Woodenware Mfg. Co. v. MurrayDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API