Legal Opinion

Oregon Woodenware Mfg. Co. v. Murray

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided July 20, 1914No. 22PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Suit by the Oregon Woodenware Manufacturing Company against Gilbert V. Murray, doing business as the Eureka Woodenware Company. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

CUSHMAN, District Judge.

Suit is brought by complainant, holding, by assignment, the Aaron M. Springer patent No. 1,012,468, issued December 19, 1911, for a certain folding ironing board. Complainant alleges infringement by defendant, who has answered, assailing the 'validity of complainant’s patent, denying infringement, and averring that the ironing board made by him is in conformity with letters patent No. 1,036,887, issued to him August 27, 1912.

The evidence shows invention, novelty, and utility in the Springer *745patent, independently of the presumption arising from the issuance of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cochrane v. DeenerSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Cantrell v. WallickSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Western Electric Co. v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. United Nickel Co. v. California Electrical WorksUnited States Circuit Court · 1885
  5. Bresnahan v. Tripp Giant Leveller Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1900

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rid-Jid Products, Inc. v. Rich Pump & Ladder Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API