Legal Opinion

John Morrell & Co. v. Doyle

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided July 31, 1937No. 831-DPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff, engaged in packing and selling meat products, including dog food, brings this suit against defendants Boyd W. Doyle, Frederick Doyle, and the same parties as a copartnership, trading under the name and style of Doyle Packing Company, likewise engaged in packing and selling dog food. Plaintiff charges that its trade-marks “Heart” and “Red Heart” are infringed by the defendants’ trade-mark “Strongheart.” The basis of plaintiff’s trade-mark is a red colored heart, used on many of its products including dog food, accompanied at times by the word “Heart” and at…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Washington Ex Rel. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co. v. FairchildSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Butterworth v. United States Ex Rel. HoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. United States v. DuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Automatic Weighing Mach. Co. v. Pneumatic Scale Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. John Morrell & Co. v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  2. Emerson Electric Mfg. Co. v. Emerson Radio & Phonograph Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1938
  3. Century Distilling Co. v. Continental Distilling Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API