Legal Opinion

Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. Ross

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1893No. 975PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From the Boone Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtLotz, J.

The appellee commenced this action against the appellant, to recover for the value oí work and materials furnished in the construction of a fence along the line of appellant’s right of way and appellee’s improved lands.

The work was done and the materials furnished under the provisions of sections 1077 and 1078, Elliott’s Supp. The court below overruled a demurrer to the complaint. This ruling is the only error assigned in this court.

It is insisted that the complaint is defective because it does not set out a copy of the thirty days’ notice which section 1078, supra, requires the land-owner to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Black v. RichardsIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Hight v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vandalia Railroad v. KanarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Chicago & South Eastern Railway Co. v. AbbottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API