Legal Opinion

Black v. Richards

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1883No. 10,958PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

The complaint in this case charged that Isaiah Black, Priscilla Pedlow and Amanda Crone are the owners of three undivided fifth parts of a tract of land in Clinton county, particularly describing it, and that Lydia Richards and .Elihu Black are together the owners in equal proportions of the remaining two undivided fifth parts of the same land; that the plaintiff Thomas Pedlow is the husband of Priscilla Pedlow, and that Robert W. Crone, the remain*185ing plaintiff, is the husband of Amanda Crone; that William W. Richards, in his own right, and John J. Richards, as the administrator of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Parsons v. MilfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Cassaday v. American Ins.Indiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Brownfield v. WeichtIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Noble v. McGinnisIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Poulk v. SlocumIndiana Supreme Court · 1834

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Baker v. SyfrittSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  2. Daugherty v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Fairbanks v. WarrumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Pate v. BushongIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Taylor v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1910

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API